Student Alumni and Graduate User Surveys
Student satisfaction
The student satisfaction survey reported “very good” ratings for lecturers (96%), professional staff (95%), program management (97%), and facilities (95%). All remaining ratings were “good”; none were “fair” or “poor”. Follow-up focuses on faculty professional development, professional and spiritual development for staff, management and leadership development, and improvement in the quality and availability of facilities.
| Aspect | Rating |
|---|---|
| Lecturers | 96% |
| Professional staff | 95% |
| Program management | 97% |
| Facilities | 95% |
Graduate-user feedback
| Aspect | Rating |
|---|---|
| Integrity | 97.7% |
| Professionalism | 95.4% |
| English proficiency | 93.2% |
| Information technology | 95.4% |
| Communication | 93.2% |
| Teamwork and leadership | 97.7% |
| Self-development | 90.9% |
| Community participation | 93.2% |
| Safety | 92.1% |
| Curriculum relevance | 93.2% |
Improvement actions include spiritual development, disciplinary workshops, TOEFL classes, technology use, therapeutic communication and public speaking, teamwork and leadership, community engagement, occupational health and safety, and responsive elective courses.
Source: English Website Copy for the Master of Nursing Program, 15 September 2026. Survey collection period, student respondent count and collection method are not specified in the supplied summary. Percentages are ratings by aspect, not respondent counts.
